Sign the Canadian Petition for Justice!


Canada Petition

PETITION

TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED

We, the undersigned, citizens (or residents) of Canada draw the attention of the House to the following:

WHEREAS:

1.      The Federal Recommended Child Support Guidelines, the Divorce Act, the Matrimonial Property Act and unequal, arbitrary access orders are unconstitutional. They violate Sect. 7, 15.1 and 28 of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

2.      Canada treats divorced parents unequally and discriminates against one parent while systematically rewarding the other parent.

3.      Judges have unlimited power to seize children for any arbitrary reason and adopt them out without evidence. Judges have unlimited power to interfere in parents lives.

4.      Canada violates Sect. 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is no court of competent jurisdiction and there are no judges that uphold the GUARANTEED Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is no legal counsel available that offers Charter Rights service.

5.      The police refuse to provide protection to victims if there is a civil case involved especially family law.

THEREFORE, your petitioners call upon Parliament To:

1.      Uphold the GUARANTEED Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and immediately provide competent, legal counsel, absorb all costs, and ensure that all judges are trained and ready to hear complaints.

2.      Repeal the Divorce Act, the Matrimonial Property Act and the Federal Recommended Child Support Guidelines and replace them with spousal and parental consent agreements and fair, negotiated divorce settlements.  We request that this user friendly solution is to supersede any court applications.

3.      Provide financial compensation to all affected, displaced families since the GUARANTEED Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was implemented on April 17, 1982.

4.      Ensure that police serve and protect citizens regardless of pending or current civil action. When a complaint is filed with police they should investigate and proceed with actions without restrictions.

Sign the petition here!

Statement of Grievance or Opinion

1.       The Federal Recommended Child Support Guidelines, the Divorce Act, the Matrimonial Property Act and unequal, arbitrary access orders are unconstitutional. They violate Sect. 7, 15.1 and 28 of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the inalienable rights of both parents to raise their own children as they see fit.

2.       That Canada is engaged in a reign of terror against families. It targets divorced and child apprehension ordered families and violates their Canadian Charter Rights and parental rights and destroys their lives forever. Canada treats divorced parents unequally and discriminates against one parent while systematically rewarding the other parent.

3.       Judges have the power to seize children for any arbitrary reason and adopt them out without a valid reason or any criminal conviction against the parents relating to the welfare of the child.

4.       Judges have unlimited power to interfere in parents lives and make all parenting decisions while downloading arbitrary costs onto the parents until long past the age of majority.

5.       Canada violates Sect. 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is no court of competent jurisdiction and no judge that upholds the GUARANTEED Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is no legal counsel available anywhere in Canada that offers Charter Rights service.

6.       Parents and families are victimized by unconstitutional family law practices. Judges violate parents’ rights by awarding complicated, unnatural, unequal, unconstitutional, unending, exclusionary and biased court orders. Canada has implemented a cult of exclusion, entitlement and alienation against the other parent and their families. The parents are completely at the mercy of the judges for very long periods of time. This slavery lasts for years until the family is financially bankrupt and any relationship with the children is completely destroyed. This continues for multiple generations. Canada is committing Crimes against Humanity.

7.       Judges have unlimited power to ruin a family. Judges arbitrarily interfere in a divorced family’s normal daily life.  In addition to mandatory child support, they force parents to pay for unwanted, arbitrary, unnecessary expenses, bogus medical costs, exorbitantly expensive private schools, universities, extended university tuition, and long term child support for adults who have no illness and are not attending post secondary education. Throughout the life of the child and long past the age of majority, the judge is in control and makes all family decisions while downloading all the expenses onto the parents, especially the non custodial parent.

8.       Divorced parents do not have the right to enter into their own negotiated divorce settlement and negotiated child parenting plan as the Federal Child Support Guidelines are mandatory.

9.       Canada and the police are not protecting people under the law, especially in family court and in criminal court. Victims are not getting help from the police and the courts when a crime(s) are committed against them. They refuse to lay charges.

10.   Divorced spouses are treated differently. One parent/spouse loses everything and the other parent/spouse gets everything, all the time. Children, home, assets and income are unfairly seized and redistributed to the other spouse without any consideration for the displaced parent. This is unconstitutional and violates Sect. 7, 15.1 and 28 of the GUARANTEED Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

11.   Canada has implemented mandatory child support. It is a huge incentive to deny the other parent access to children on an equal shared custody basis. Spouses who provide equal shared custody could lose their child support. Both parents should be responsible for their own child care expenses.

12.   Canada has violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and in particular, Sect. 24 of the GUARANTEED Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is no court of competent jurisdiction and no judge that upholds the GUARANTEED Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is no conflict – free, competent, legal counsel or law firm that will provide Charter Rights service to the victims. There is no funding. Canadians are not protected. There is no GUARANTEED Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is the biggest fraud committed against Canadians by the government of Canada.

13.   Canadian non custodial parents’ rights have been irreparably violated and abused by the Canadian judicial system when it comes to their parental rights, their children, their homes and their incomes. They have suffered extreme mental, family, social, alienation and financial destruction to their families. This destruction will continue into the next generations of children and their families. Their children have been taken away either by force, alienation or greed and they will never, ever recover.

Sign here! Warning! Canada is not safe for families!

http://www.gopetition.com/petition/43582.html

http://www.gopetition.com/petition/43582.html

Connie Brauer and Victor Harris

For all the people of Canada who want to raise their own children  and live in peace!

Falmouth, NS Canada

cbrauer@eastlink.ca

Advertisements

Kopyto faces Law Society on Tues Sept 28th & Thurs Sept 30th 2010 for the right to practice as Para Legal.


Harry Kopyto

Kopyto faces Law Society on Tues Sept 28th & Thurs Sept 30th 2010

September 22, 2010

When Kopyto shows up at his Law Society (LSUC) hearing in the Museum Room at Osgoode Hall at 9:30 a.m. on September 28, 2010, he will be facing a three-person Panel.  This Panel has, by its abuse of fair and consistent process disqualified itself from dealing with the motion that he has brought in his “good character” hearing to be allowed to work as a paralegal.  What have they done?

  • The Panel Chair Carl Fleck telephoned the LSUC prosecutors behind Kopyto’s back.  Judges are not supposed to speak with parties that appear before them out of court.  What kind of judge contacts one side secretly during a hearing before him?
  • The Panel ordered Kopyto by e-mail to file a massive amount of documents on all his constitutional challenges and motions on only six days notice and without an opportunity for Kopyto to ask for a longer time period.  There is only one word for such conduct: abuse.
  • The Panel ordered Kopyto to pay costs for daring to challenge the participation of Paul Dray on the Panel.  It breached fundamental principles of natural justice by not even allowing him to make submissions on the costs issue.  Has the Panel never heard of fairness and due process?
  • Kopyto is seeking the correspondence of one of the Panel members Paul Dray with the Competition Bureau. He believes that this correspondence is relevant to his constitutional challenge to the Law Society’s taking over paralegals, thereby eliminating competition.  Kopyto’s challenge to Dray’s remaining on the Panel because of his conflict of interest was denied.  In doing so, the Panel Chair Carl Fleck made a statement on behalf of all three Panel members when the rules require Paul Dray to give his own reasons in a separate decision for refusing to resign.  The optics would not have looked good so Carl Fleck ignored the rules.  Is there no shame?

   For the rest of the story, Click Here.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Police make a peaceful demonstration, unsafe for everybody.


Following sent to CTV News

Go to the following url and read the Press Release by the Toronto
Police with respect to the F4J Demonstration at Jack LAYTON’s office
on 08 Aug 08.

http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/newsreleases/pdfs/14711.pdf

Go to the following url and view the photos of the men on the roof of
Jack LAYTON’s office. NOTE: The police refer to this as a house. Note
that Plywoodman is wearing a safety harness. Could this be confused
with a noose in full daylight. Do persons threatening suicide
normally wear a full safety harness.

Your full raw footage may also be viewed. I know it will produce
nothing to support the Toronto Police Press Release.

http://www.f4jcanada.com/OntarioPages/No_Dads_Party_August_08_08.html

The arrest of Mr. BOGAN was filmed and broadcast by your Toronto
station. Did any of your personnel on scene obtain footage of
a “noose”

Below find the text of a letter sent to the 55 Division. Confirmed
received by phone on the evening of 08 August, 2008.
Toronto Police Service
Officer in Charge, 55 Division

Via Fax 416-808-5502

Dear Sir or Madam:

I have received information that you are holding two of our
members in custody resulting from what began as a peaceful non
criminal demonstration, and was escalated into dangerous incident by
the actions of the Toronto Police.

In this letter I will not belabour the doctrine of reasonable
and probable grounds. I am sure you are well versed in them and in
the haste to create a spectacle they were simply forgotten and or
ignored by your members.

I have heard reports that our members will be charged. The
proposed charges on the news reports are trespassing and or mischief.
I have also heard “interfering with public property” I will write
that off as either a very inexperienced police officer or a media
error. I have also heard “vandalism” which would in effect be
mischief. To my knowledge there was no damage done by our members.

With respect to the proposed charge of trespassing, the only
criminal charges with respect to trespassing would be trespass by
night, at or near a dwelling house. From the information I have
received it appears that the building involved in this is a
commercial building, in any event the time involved is the daylight
hours thus negating any criminal charge.

With respect to a possible charge of mischief. Two protesters
on a flat roof protesting for their civil rights in no way interferes
with anyone. The only interference in this incident was actions of
members of the Toronto Police Service.

In a free and democratic society it is the right of all
citizens to peacefully protest. There are of course laws limiting
that right. The proper procedure in the case of this trespass would
be for the owner of the property in question to, either directly
themselves, or by an authorized agent, request that the protesters
leave their property. If the protesters refused the next step would
be for the owner to apply for an injunction in the Superior Court of
Justice compelling the protesters to vacate the property. Once the
protesters were informed of the court injunction and if they then
still refused to leave then the matter would be a matter for police
action in enforcing the Superior Court injunction.

The police are agents of the State, not a private security
agency. Your officers do not and should not deal with matters which
are not a breach of the peace and involve civil matters. As stated
above, if your services are required it is the jurisdiction of the
courts to give you such direction.

I therefore demand the immediate release of our members. As
the Officer in charge of 55 Division we, as of the time of receipt of
this letter, hold you personally responsible for the unlawful
detention of our members Denis VanDecker, and Mark Bogan. Your
personal responsibility in this matter does not of course absolve the
Toronto Police Service of liability for the continued unlawful
detention as a result of unlawful arrest of our aforsaid members.

A subsequent release of our members by the courts under any
conditions does not absolve you and or the Toronto Police Service of
liability in this unlawful arrest and detention.

You may contact me at (778) 837-1224

Hal Legere, VP and Director of Legal Affairs
Fathers-4-Justice (Canada)